NHS funding debate call by health experts
How the NHS is funded should be a national debate according to leading health experts.
Signatories include the heads of the Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Nursing.
Without action an extra £30 billion will be needed by 2020 to fund the NHS at current levels their letter adds.
They are asking for a cross-party, independent conversation on the way forward for the “scope, provision and funding of health and social care”.
The nine signatories say that in 50 years’ time, at least two-and-a-half times as many patients will suffer from multiple health problems.
Their letter says: “The status quo is not an option. We are already seeing the signs of the system creaking at the seams.”
Warning that “business as usual won’t do”, they assert there needs to be “an honest, open dialogue between politicians and citizens”.
“We need a new settlement; a fundamental, holistic agreement with the country on what health and social care should be, how and where it is delivered to maximise the quality of care, and how it should be paid for.”
This “national conversation” should start now and be completed by the end of 2015, the letter concludes.
Two signatories – Ciaran Devane, chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, and Turning Point chief executive Lord Adebowale – are non-executive directors of NHS England.
It is also signed by: Sir John Oldham, who chaired the Independent Commission on Whole Person Care; Jeremy Hughes, chief executive of the Alzheimer’s Society; Peter Carter, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing; Maureen Baker, chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs; Sir Richard Thompson, president of the Royal College of Physicians; Jean-Pierre van Besouw, president of the Royal College of Anaesthetists, and Chris Hopson, chief executive of the Foundation Trust Network.