NICE- killer quango wants taxpayers to bribe obese and smokers
NICE the killer quango wants to waste taxpayers money by suggesting that the NHS should bribe fat people to lose weight and smokers to quit, and give children toys for eating their fruit and vegetables.The Killer Quango- the National Institute for Curbing Expenditure (NICE) was set up in early 1999 by the labour Secretary of State for Health Frank Dobson and has since condemned hundreds of cancer sufferers to early deaths and blighted thousands to painful existences by restricting payments- creating postcode lotteries for health care.
Now during the credit crunch nice want to waste millions of taxpayers pounds bribing people when earlier pilot studies showed that there were high drop out rates and up to 80% failed to reach their targets.
The advice, which will be published by the National Institute for Curbing Expenditure, has been greeted with anger by critics who claimed such “bribes” were draining the public purse of money which could be better spent elsewhere.
The study examined a series of schemes, including one in Kent which pays dieters up to £425 for losing weight and another in Scotland which gives pregnant women shopping vouchers worth up to £650 for quitting the habit.
It also looked at programmes in Oxford, Manchester, London and Bangor in Wales, where schools have been given toys such as juggling balls, stickers and pencils to children who have eaten their fruit and vegetables.
Fiona McEvoy, from the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said state funds should not be used to pay people to change their lifestyles,
She said: “Bribing people to lose weight or quit smoking is nothing but a quick fix which patronises the individuals in question and drains much-needed money away from the public purse. At a time when cancer drugs are being denied to sufferers due to lack of funds, many will be disgusted to learn that NICE are considering such a costly approach.”
Other schemes examined in the report include a pilot in Manchester which rewards overweight parents for walking their children to school.
As part of a £30m project, supermarket points are given to unfit people who attend keep-fit classes, weight loss clubs or go for a run in the park.
Overweight people gain credit points they can cash in for groceries just for turning up, with extra rewards depending on how much weight they lose.
In Newcastle, Bristol, Torbay, Manchester and Bury St Edmunds, those aged 16 to 22 are given subsidised gym membership if they visit at least once a week.
However, the report found limited evidence about whether the schemes make a difference.
In the Scottish antismoking project, for instance, the study acknowledged that four fifths of the women in the £43,000 scheme were smoking again within three months of giving birth.
The recommendations from NICE’s independent citizens council do not constitute its official advice to the NHS. Its board will launch a public consultation on the matter before considering the paper, which would inform future guidance.
However, the rationing body has already supported financial rewards for heroin addicts.
Originally NICE recommended that addicts who attended treatment programmes should be given the chance to win prizes, such as televisions and MP3 players.
The body dropped the idea following a public outcry but instead recommended that shopping vouchers worth up to £10 could be awarded to those who completed programmes, or showed they were clear of drugs.
NICE has been widely criticised for refusing to pay for dozens of cancer drugs on the grounds of cost. Medicines rejected include the drugs Avastin for advanced bowel cancer and Nexavar for advanced liver cancer.
Last year the institute fuelled controversy when it ruled marriage guidance counselling should be funded by the NHS, and supported the use of acupuncture for back pain, despite finding there was no good evidence it worked.
The report follows a three day meeting of NICE’s citizens council, where members were asked to vote about the use of incentives.
“More than 60 per cent said they were in favour of such schemes, as long as they were only used as a “last resort” and were not exchangeable for tobacco or alcohol.
Sir Michael Rawlins, the chairman of NICE said: “We clearly face several public health challenges in today’s society, some more obvious than others, and we must seek to improve these in ways that are likely to achieve the best outcomes to those affected.
“The majority of the council has voted in favour of the use of incentives under certain circumstances, but this clearly remains a divisive issue”.
Public consultation on the report starts today.
Health Direct finds this new waste of taxpayers money a disgrace. Research in pilot studies has clearly showed that bribing people to lose weight and stop smoking DOES NOT WORK in the vast majority of cases.
On June 10, 2010 Health Direct published research :Nanny state cash bribes for good health fail three quarters of patients at http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2010/06/nanny-state-cash-bribes-for-good-health-fail-three-quarters-of-patients.html
A Department of Health spokesman has already described them as an undesirable use of money and should only be adopted as a “last resort”.
If you would like to tell the killer quango NICE what you think of this scheme, comments should be sent to Clifford Middleton, Research and Development Project Manager at firstname.lastname@example.org by 5pm on Friday, 26 November 2010.
If email is a problem for you, please send your comments in a letter to Clifford Middleton at:
71 High Holborn,
London WC1V 6NA.
One Comment so far:Posted by: Health Direct on September 28, 2010
Tags: Avastin, Cancer, cancer drugs, cancer survival, Health Direct, labour cutbacks, Labour shambles, nanny state, Nexavar, NHS Deaths, NICE, NICE blight, obese, postcode lottery, preventable crisis, red tape, smokers, TaxPayers Alliance