NHS patients will be able to book GP appointments online and get test results online within three years from a new health direct website.The moves are part of a new Information Strategy designed to “take the hassle out of the health service”.

Online communications between patients and their doctors is already happening in some places.

But the strategy sets out plans to ensure there is universal adoption of digital technologies.

The Department of Health is also encouraging the NHS and private companies to develop new health apps for smart phones and tablet computers.

Repeat prescriptions will also be available from 2015 too.

The deadline mirrors the goal of giving patients access to electronic medical records – something thatwas part of tony bliar’s vision for the NHS in his NPfIT £12 billion dream.

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “Our NHS reforms are about making life easier for patients.

“By allowing people to access the NHS online, we will put an end to the 8am rush to phone your GP to try and book an appointment. Reforms like this will take the hassle out of the health service.”

Dr Laurence Buckman, chairman of the British Medical Association’s GPs Committee, said: “There are GP surgeries which have been pioneering online booking and repeat prescriptions for a while now so we would support the wider implementation of this, as long as it doesn’t impact on patients without IT access who can continue to book appointments in the usual way.

“However, we would caution against the potential use of email for consultations, because compared to a telephone or face-to-face consultation it is difficult for GPs to assess someone quickly and safely this way.

“When it comes to patients being able to view their records online, we believe patients should have access to their health records but we’d want to be satisfied that their records would remain secure before this was implemented – for example it would be important to be certain that it couldn’t be an abusive partner or a parent trying to access their teenager’s records. All patients need to be confident that their records are held safely otherwise they may not feel comfortable talking to their GP about confidential issues.”

Given that the government has an appalling record on leaking and losing your records from everything from DVLA to the tax office we caution against rushing out and signing up for similar treatments.

NHS hospitals had to be bailed out to the tune of almost £415 million last year after running out of cash according to Department of Health figures.In total 31 hospitals had to be given extra emergency funding to keep them going in 2011-12, up from 21 the previous year.

The payments have risen dramatically since 2009-10, when the department started collating full figures.

That year, they were £187.1 million, while in 2010-11 they rose slightly to £223.0 million, before jumping to £414.2 million.

The big rise coincided with a tighter budget settlement for the NHS as a whole,which has resulted in drops in referrals to hospitals and tighter restrictions on surgery for operations like hip and knee replacements.

Andrew Lansley said: “Labour left us a dismal legacy of challenged hospitals, burdening some of them with PFI deals they could not afford, huge debts, and poor financial governance.

“Even with the Government’s decision to protect NHS spending, the challenges of an ageing population and rising costs mean that these problems cannot be swept under the carpet any longer.

“For some hospital trusts, the challenges they face may be too great for them to take on alone.  That is why we are helping them overcome their problems, with short-term support if necessary, so that they become sustainable in the long-term.”

The largest single bailout was for South London Healthcare Trust, which received £79.2 million last year. Over three years it has been handed £168.7 million. Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust was the second biggest recipient in 2011-12, taking £57.7 million in total.

From: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/Hospital-bailouts-top-400m

Savage cuts to nursing are stretching resources “to breaking point”, the largest nursing union says today at it’s conference.Government plans to shift care out of hospital and closer to patients’ homes are being used as a cover for the cuts, the Royal College of Nursing warns. It is also leading to patients being discharged too early, the RCN reports.

Over 26,000 nursing posts have been cut in the last two years and a further 61,000 are at risk, according to the RCN.

The college says that, despite government rhetoric claiming more care is being provided outside hospital, there has been less than a 1 per cent increase in the community nursing workforce in the last decade and community nursing is “stretched to breaking point”.

The figures come as Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, prepares to address the RCN congress today. In an interview with The Independent ahead of the speech, Mr Lansley denied there were mass reductions in nurse numbers.

He also said staffing numbers were not the only factor in providing good patient care. “In some hospitals the staffing ratios are exactly what we would expect, but some wards are really excellent and some are really bad. This is about leadership,” he said.

Mr Lansley added that a recent staff survey shows that, across the NHS, only 65 per cent of staff would recommend their hospital to friends or family.

A poll conducted for the college on the eve of its annual congress in Harrogate found 90 per cent of respondents agreed patients were being discharged sooner from hospital and with more complex needs than a year ago.

Dr Peter Carter, chief executive of the RCN, said: “Nurses are stretched too thin and many are approaching breaking point. Inevitably patients are going to suffer.” The RCN supported a shift from hospital to community care but nurses reported patients being discharged from hospital before social-care support was in place.

The Health minister Simon Burns said he did not recognise the RCN’s figures: “There are only 450 fewer qualified nursing staff in England than in 2009 and in 2011-12 we expect to train 2,300 community nurses and health visitors.”

From: http://www.independent.co.uk/government-is-cutting-nursing-numbers-by-stealth

One in three NHS staff say they are not enough people in their department to get their work done, according to the annual health service survey.And almost half of NHS staff said they do not have time to complete their tasks, it was warned.

Staff cuts and a lack of cover when people are on leave or sick is to blame, a union said.

The 2011 NHS Staff Survey, of more than 135,000 health service workers in England, found some were struggling with heavy workloads.

The official NHS staff survey comes after the Royal College of Nursing warned that one in three nurses working on older people’s wards are too busy to help patients with eating or going to the lavatory.

However when hospital staff were asked if a friend or relative needed treatment in their organisation, they would be happy with the standards of care, the proportion answering ‘yes’ varied from just one in three at Croydon Health Services NHS Trust to 96 per cent at Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology NHS Foundation Trust.

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “This survey shows that NHS staff remain committed to providing the highest quality of care to their patients.

“The number of staff happy with the standard of care remains stable, with some foundation trusts performing to a very high standard. Too many trusts continue to have less favourable levels of recommendation to family and friends.”

“The NHS should use this as a basis for seeing improvement in the services we deliver for patients in the future.”

Christina McAnea, Unison head of health, said: “The staff survey reflects some of the pressures felt by staff, but our own survey painted a much bleaker picture.

“Unison’s survey showed that 85% experienced an increase in workload and 83% suffered an increase in stress over the past year. The increase in workload is not a coincidence, it is down to cuts in staffing and to a lack of cover for staff on sick or on leave.”

The NHS survey also found that a fifth of staff said they cannot do their job to a standard they are personally pleased with and half would not recommend their trust as a good place to work.

Almost nine out of ten staff who deal with patients said they were satisfied with the quality of care they provided.

From: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/NHS-staff-overworked-survey-finds

A ban on tobacco displays is coming into force in England today – with ministers promising it will help curb the number of young people taking up smoking.Cigarettes and other products will have to be kept below the counter in large shops and supermarkets, while small outlets are exempt until 2015.

Other parts of the UK are planning similar action to drive down smoking rates.

Andrew Lansley Health Secretary said: “Firstly, it reduces the visibility of tobacco and smoking to young people. And, of course two thirds of smokers started smoking before they were eighteen.

“So, if we can, literally, arrive at a place where young people just don’t think about smoking and they don’t see tobacco and they don’t see cigarettes – then I hope we can make a big difference.”

He said the government recognised the pressures on retailers to comply with the ban but added: “We want to arrive at a place where we no longer see smoking as a normal part of life. We’re doing it by stages with constant active pressure.”

A fifth of adults smoke – a figure which has remained steady in recent years after decades of rapid falls.

A plan to force manufacturers to put cigarettes into plain packets is also expected to be put out to consultation later this year.

The display ban will apply to shops of more than 280 sq m (3,014 sq ft).

Public health minister Anne Milton cited evidence from Ireland which suggested the measure could play an important role in discouraging young people in particular from smoking.

“We cannot ignore the fact that young people are recruited into smoking by colourful, eye-catching, cigarette displays.  Most adult smokers started smoking as teenagers and we need to stop this trend.”

Jo Butcher, of the National Children’s Bureau, agreed: “It’s essential that we create a culture that promotes and protects public health and tobacco legislation is a significant factor in making this happen.”

Jean King, of charity Cancer Research UK, said the ban would help stop children who are attracted to brightly coloured tobacco packaging from taking up smoking but further action was still needed.

“Of course we want to see the pack branding taken away as well. This is not a normal consumer product, it kills people. We want to protect the next generation of children,” she said.

Andrew Opie, from the British Retail Consortium, said it was wrong to believe the legislation would have a major effect on young people and it was supermarkets and other shops which were bearing the brunt of the costs needed to comply with the ban.

He said the organisation had calculated that it cost more than £15 million to ensure everything was sorted out before the ban came into place.

He said: “Children are more likely to smoke when they’re in a household where parents smoke and also they tend to get their cigarettes from either parents, or older peers, not directly from supermarkets.

The display ban was announced by the government last year as part of its tobacco control strategy.

Although the legislation allowing it to happen was actually put in place by the Labour government before it lost power in 2010.

A number of countries, including Canada, Ireland, Iceland and Finland, have already introduced similar bans.

Prof David Hammond from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, said the ban led to a decline in smoking – especially among the young – in Canada.

“The declines were greatest in the provinces where the ban had been implemented the longest. And that’s consistent with the idea that when you remove something like marketing, it takes some time for the residual marketing to wear out.”

From: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17626133

The bitter 14 month parliamentary battle over the NHS finally came to an end last night after the Government comfortably fended off a last desperate attempt by Labour to delay the health legislation.MPs have approved the last amendments to the Health and Social Care Bill – leaving the way clear for Royal Assent to be granted before Parliament starts its Easter recess next week.

The NHS shake-up has threatened to drive a wedge between the coalition partners ever since it was unveiled by Tory Health Secretary Andrew Lansley.

It is intended to give GPs greater control over NHS budgets, reduce bureaucracy, and increase patient choice.

But while there was jubilation among Tory and Liberal Democrat ministers, opponents have warned that the problems are only just beginning.

RCN chief executive and general secretary Dr Peter Carter described the reforms as “deeply flawed”.

He said: “We have achieved some concessions which make the Bill a different piece of legislation from that which first appeared, but our real concerns about the future of the NHS have not been heeded.

“It is now our responsibility to patients to do everything we can to ensure that the health service runs as best as it can despite the massive upheaval that this Bill will bring.

“We intend to work with trusts, regulators and other bodies but our fear is that in the fullness of time this Bill will be a cause of significant regret.

“Perhaps most importantly we will be supporting nurses who are going to have to pick up the pieces and still deliver the best care they can for patients through this extremely difficult time of change.”

Furious opposition from professional bodies and Lib Dem activists led David Cameron and Nick Clegg to take the highly unusual step of “pausing” the legislation last year.

Despite accepting more than a thousand amendments – including limits on competition and private sector involvement – the Government has failed to win over many health workers.

Lib Dems embarrassed Mr Clegg at the party’s spring conference this month by again refusing to back the measures in a vote.

And there is speculation that the controversy could yet cost Mr Lansley his job in a reshuffle expected over the coming months.

When the Cabinet met yesterday, ministers from both parties banged the table to celebrate news that the reforms had finally cleared the House of Lords.

An emergency debate called by Labour had the potential to delay the Bill until an internal assessment of risks had been published.

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham demanded that the Government publish the risk register, insisting: “People outside will struggle to understand how Members of this House could make such momentous decisions without having carefully considered all of the facts and all of the evidence.”

But Mr Lansley accused Labour of “political opportunism”, saying civil servants needed “safe space” in which to advise ministers.

The Commons defeated the motion by 328 to 246 – a majority of 82. No Lib Dem MPs sided with the opposition, with the most vocal critics choosing to abstain.

After the House agreed more than 370 amendments to formally pass the Bill later, Mr Burnham insisted the “fight will go on” and promised to repeal the measures if Labour returned to power.

“We have given this fight everything that we had,” he said. “All I can say is our fight will go on to protect and restore this party’s finest achievement.”

From: http://www.independent.co.uk/nhs-reforms-approved-by-parliament

Seven English NHS hospital trusts with debts caused by Labour’s Private Finance Initiative (PFI) debts are to have access to a £1.5 billion government bailout fund.The subsidy will be available over the course of 25 year long contracts.

Trusts will have to show they have improved efficiency and provide good care in order to access the money.

The seven trusts are: Barking, Havering and Redbridge, St Helens and Knowsley, South London, Peterborough and Stamford, North Cumbria, Dartford and Gravesham and Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells.

There are 100 plus PFI schemes, where private firms pay to build hospitals, leaving the NHS to pay an annual fee or “mortgage”.

Coalition ministers have attacked Labour over its deals, but the National Audit Office recently reported that for most trusts with financial difficulties PFI was just part of the problem.

The Department of Health says without the funding, services at the hospitals would be put at risk.

Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: “We need to balance the accountability of the NHS at local level to live within its means on one hand, with recognising that there is a legacy of debt for some trusts with PFI schemes.”

The Government is trying to reassure women fitted with PIP implants to prevent a rush for NHS surgery to remove faulty breast implants.The adverts, to run in a number of national newspapers at the weekend, will emphasise there is “no clear evidence” that the French made implants cause more harm than other brands.

Almost £135,000 is being spent by the Department of Health on the campaign, which will also run in social media sites. Posters will appear in GPs’ surgeries and hospitals as well.

The advert reads: “The latest advice from the NHS and plastic surgery experts is that women with PiP breast implants do not need to have them removed unless they have symptoms such as pain and tenderness.

“There is no link to cancer and there is no clear evidence of an increased risk of harm compared to other brands of breast implants.”

However, it also states, in large-type at the top of the advert: “The NHS will support women with PiP breast implants.”

Clarifying the situation for those who received implants as part of private breast enlargement operations, it states: “”The NHS will remove your implants if your doctor agrees, but the NHS will not replace implants unless it is clinically necessary.”

It advises those worried about whether they have implants made by Poly Implant Prothese (PIP), which contain industrial-grade silicone, to find out if they have them, to speak to their specialist or GP, and “agree what’s best for you”.

Despite the campaign, Fazel Fatah, president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS), said the organisation’s stance remained that all 40,000 women fitted with them in Britain should have them removed.

He said: “We remain steadfast in our recommendation to the public of precautionary removal of these defective devices. Although there is no immediate health risk, the gel within these implants is simply not meant to be inside the human body.”

A survey of its 230 members found 95 per cent agreed that “it should be the clinics and hospitals that should pay for the replacement surgery, rather than burden the taxpayer with these costs”.

Women given the PIP implants are due to protest in London on Saturday at the reluctance of private firms like Harley Medical Group, The Hospital Group and Transform Cosmetic Surgery to fund removal and replacement surgery.

Explaining the rationale for the campaign, Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, said: “The refusal of some clinics to help their patients has left some of those women worried and confused.

“That’s why we are running this ad campaign, to give women clear, definitive advice about what course of action they should take. I hope it helps women decide what is best for them. We have made it very clear to private companies what we expect of them – to provide their patients with the aftercare that they need and deserve.”

“I do not think it is fair to the taxpayer or other NHS patients for the NHS to foot the bill.  We will pursue private clinics with all means at our disposal to avoid this.”

Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, NHS medical director and leader of an expert group on PIP implants convened by Mr Lansley, said: “At present there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine removal of these implants.

“But I know women will be worried. That’s why the expert group supports the NHS offer and believes the private industry should do the same.”

From: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/Breast-implant-scandal-Government-campaign-to-reassure-women

The number of people being admitted to hospital after drinking too much alcohol has more than doubled in less than a decade, new research show.Some 1,173,386 people in England were admitted to casualty for injuries or illnesses caused by drinking in 2010/11, compared with just 510,780 in 2002/3, according to the research.

The figures for last year represent an 11 per cent increase on the previous 12 months, when alcohol-related admissions stood at 1,056,962.

Separate information published by Anne Milton, the public health minister, showed that since January an estimated 7,074 under-18s have been admitted to hospital due to alcohol abuse.

A recent report predicted that binge drinking will cost the NHS £3.8 billion by 2015, with 1.5 million A&E admissions a year.

Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, blamed Labour’s 24-hour drinking policy and accused the last government of “taking their eye of the ball” on the issue of binge drinking.

He said: “These figures are disturbing evidence that, despite total consumption of alcohol not increasing recently, we have serious problems with both binge-drinking and long-term excessive alcohol abuse in a minority of people.

“Our alcohol strategy, which we will set out in the new year, will outline what further steps we are taking to tackle this growing problem.”

Recent Local Alcohol Profiles for England figures also show that the number of hospital admissions for conditions attributable to alcohol are rising at a similar rate.

The number of admissions has more than doubled since 2002/03 and increased by nine per cent last year.

In 2002/03 there were 926 admissions per 100,000 people for conditions caused by alcohol, rising to 1,743 per 100,000 in 2009/10 and 1,898 last year.

The biggest increase over the past 12 months was in London, with a jump in admissions of 14 per cent, followed by the East of England with 10 per cent.

The number of NHS patients who have to undergo emergency readmission to hospital within a month of being discharged has increased by more than three quarters over the last decade, the Daily Telegraph has disclosed.Hospitals have been accused by ministers of treating patients “like parts on a production line” after official figures suggested that hundreds of thousands of people every year are being sent home before they are well enough.

More than 660,000 people were brought back to hospital last year within 28 days of leaving, statistics show, sparking allegations that patients are being “hurried through the system” so the NHS can meet waiting-list targets.

The official figures show that some NHS trusts have seen their emergency readmission rate rise more than threefold over the past decade – while some hospitals have seen only a modest increase.

Last night, Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, said that the “hugely distressing” trend must stop.

“Patients have a right to expect that when they go in for treatment that they are looked after properly and that the treatment they are given helps them to recover,” he said.

“Having to be readmitted and treated all over again is hugely distressing. These figures show how Labour’s obsession with waiting time targets meant that patients were treated like parts on a production line to be hurried through the system rather than like people who need to be properly cared for.”

The Department of Health has released detailed information on the number of emergency readmissions in every area across Britain.

The figures show that 620,054 patients had to be readmitted in 2009-10 – compared to just 348,996 a decade before, a 78 per cent increase. Over the past five years, there has been a 31 per cent rise and a five per cent increase on the previous 12 months.

The data also highlights the widespread regional variations. The rate of readmission in the Kensington & Chelsea PCT area has risen by 287 per cent over the past decade to 1,582 people.

However, North Lincolnshire PCT has only experienced a 3.37 per cent rise over the same period.

Hospitals within the Hampshire PCT area readmitted 13,239 people last year. The nearby area covered by the Isle of Wight PCT only had to readmit 1,098 people.

The figures, do not include patients suffering from cancer or mental health problems or maternity patients.

Most of the areas with the highest increases in readmission numbers are in London and the south east, where pressure is greatest on the NHS. The Department of Health has analysed the social make-up of each area and concludes that the so-called “thriving London periphery” – the relatively wealthy commuter hinterland around the capital has suffered the biggest recent deterioration.

About 10 million people are admitted to hospital wards each year. Critics claim that government targets, such as the demand that patients be admitted to hospital for treatment within 18 weeks of seeing their GP, mean hospital managers are pressured into releasing patients early to make beds available.

Earlier this month, The Daily Telegraph disclosed that the Government is moving from a system of targets for hospitals based on waiting and treatment times – to a system of so-called “outcomes” which measures the success of treatment.

In a criticism of previous targets which he blames for the increase in emergency readmissions, Mr Lansley said: “Instead of focusing on the results which actually matter for patients, they focused on narrow processes to the detriment of patient care. That is why we have taken action to address these increases in emergency readmissions.

“One of the new goals we are setting the NHS is reducing emergency readmissions. In order to help achieve this we have created a re-ablement fund of £300 million and we have taken action to stop hospitals being paid when they readmit a patient after discharging them too early. These steps will turn Labour’s poor performance around.”

Under the Government scheme, hospitals will effectively be responsible for people’s care in the weeks after they return home and will be financially penalised for discharging patients too soon.

From:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/Scandal-of-NHS-production-line-as-readmissions-soar