NHS University- an embarrassing failure to deliver value for money says Labour government review
The NHS University (NHSU) the internal training and education body which cost £72m and was scrapped after less than two years, delivered 'too little too late', according to a scathing report that the labour government tried to suppress. A review carried out during the organisation's short existence warns that the Department of Health would suffer 'significant embarrassment' if anyone probed the value for money provided by the NHSU.
It also said there was a lack of clarity about where the NHSU fitted into the 'crowded healthcare education and training sector'.
The report, written by former NHS Appointments Commission chair Sir William Wells, was produced before the announcement, in November 2004, that the NHSU would be scrapped as part of the government's review of NHS arms-length bodies, but the government did not publish the report.
As Health Direct posted in last week's HSJ, health informatician Rod Ward lodged a request for the report in January 2005 - the first ever Freedom of Information request to the DoH - but it refused to hand it over until an Information Commissioner ruling last week.
According to the report, the NHSU was flawed from the outset. 'We have been struck by the absence of simple, clear descriptions of the NHSU's purpose and the parameters of its role,' it states. The lack of clear boundaries with other training organisations caused 'confusion and friction', it says.
The NHSU's reputation among stakeholders was poor as it was 'delivering too little too late to establish credibility in the eyes of the NHS', Sir William wrote.
Course take-up was well below projected volumes, and efforts by the NHSU to achieve genuine university status were a 'distraction'. The status was pressed for by ministers but was unlikely to happen.
The report also reveals that NHSU had a budget of £28m in its first year, rising to £44m in its second year, and it was bidding for £73m the following year.
The report was finally given to Mr Ward last week, more than two years after his request. He was told by the DoH that it had not released the report earlier because 'it would prejudice any future reviews which might be conducted by the department into the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of sponsored bodies'.
Mr Ward said: 'Hopefully we can learn some lessons from this so we don't repeat the same mistakes. It is about having clear proposals when you are spending taxpayers' money and being more open with information that should be freely available.'
All that a Department of Health spokesman could say was: 'We have learned valuable lessons from NHSU and have implemented the main recommendations in Sir William Wells' report.'
From:
http://www.hsj.co.uk/healthservicejournal/pages/n1/p7/070419
The sorry issue that was theNHS University was psotes about on Nov 01, 2005 in Red tape costs soar as Labour's health quangos cost£37m when the closure of eight arm's length bodies has cost the Department of Health £32m over the past year while the establishment of four new bodies since November 2004 has cost a further £4.7 million.
The figures came in response to parliamentary questions from shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley on how much has been spent implementing cuts to NHS arm's-length bodies in a process designed to save £500m by 2008-09.
Mr Lansley said the findings showed that 'the cost of rearranging desks has reached £37m thus far, with no discernable reduction in the level of administration and no discernable improvement in the standard of patient care.'
Another sign of Labour's double incompetence is that since November 2004, eight bodies have been wound up: the Family Health Services Appeal Authority, the Health Development Agency, the National Clinical Assessment Authority, the National Radiological Protection Board, the Public Health Laboratory Service, the NHS Information Authority, the Modernisation Agency and the NHSU.
And four new bodies have been established: the Health and Social Care Information Centre, the Human Tissue Authority, NHS Connecting for Health and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.
It also said there was a lack of clarity about where the NHSU fitted into the 'crowded healthcare education and training sector'.
The report, written by former NHS Appointments Commission chair Sir William Wells, was produced before the announcement, in November 2004, that the NHSU would be scrapped as part of the government's review of NHS arms-length bodies, but the government did not publish the report.
As Health Direct posted in last week's HSJ, health informatician Rod Ward lodged a request for the report in January 2005 - the first ever Freedom of Information request to the DoH - but it refused to hand it over until an Information Commissioner ruling last week.
According to the report, the NHSU was flawed from the outset. 'We have been struck by the absence of simple, clear descriptions of the NHSU's purpose and the parameters of its role,' it states. The lack of clear boundaries with other training organisations caused 'confusion and friction', it says.
The NHSU's reputation among stakeholders was poor as it was 'delivering too little too late to establish credibility in the eyes of the NHS', Sir William wrote.
Course take-up was well below projected volumes, and efforts by the NHSU to achieve genuine university status were a 'distraction'. The status was pressed for by ministers but was unlikely to happen.
The report also reveals that NHSU had a budget of £28m in its first year, rising to £44m in its second year, and it was bidding for £73m the following year.
The report was finally given to Mr Ward last week, more than two years after his request. He was told by the DoH that it had not released the report earlier because 'it would prejudice any future reviews which might be conducted by the department into the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of sponsored bodies'.
Mr Ward said: 'Hopefully we can learn some lessons from this so we don't repeat the same mistakes. It is about having clear proposals when you are spending taxpayers' money and being more open with information that should be freely available.'
All that a Department of Health spokesman could say was: 'We have learned valuable lessons from NHSU and have implemented the main recommendations in Sir William Wells' report.'
From:
http://www.hsj.co.uk/healthservicejournal/pages/n1/p7/070419
The sorry issue that was theNHS University was psotes about on Nov 01, 2005 in Red tape costs soar as Labour's health quangos cost£37m when the closure of eight arm's length bodies has cost the Department of Health £32m over the past year while the establishment of four new bodies since November 2004 has cost a further £4.7 million.
The figures came in response to parliamentary questions from shadow health secretary Andrew Lansley on how much has been spent implementing cuts to NHS arm's-length bodies in a process designed to save £500m by 2008-09.
Mr Lansley said the findings showed that 'the cost of rearranging desks has reached £37m thus far, with no discernable reduction in the level of administration and no discernable improvement in the standard of patient care.'
Another sign of Labour's double incompetence is that since November 2004, eight bodies have been wound up: the Family Health Services Appeal Authority, the Health Development Agency, the National Clinical Assessment Authority, the National Radiological Protection Board, the Public Health Laboratory Service, the NHS Information Authority, the Modernisation Agency and the NHSU.
And four new bodies have been established: the Health and Social Care Information Centre, the Human Tissue Authority, NHS Connecting for Health and the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.
Labels: Labour waste, NHS closures, NHS fiasco, NHSU
posted by Dr Search- Principal Consultant at the Search Clinic at
9:56 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home